WordPress co-founder information countersuit in opposition to WP Engine over trademark violations

There’s been one other flip in Automattic and WordPress co-founder Matt Mullenweg’s ongoing authorized battle with WordPress supplier WP Engine. In a counterclaim Automattic filed as a part of WP Engine’s lawsuit in opposition to the corporate, it claims funding from non-public fairness agency Silver Lake led WP Engine to violate its logos and fail to contribute to the open-source WordPress mission.

Automattic believes that following a $250 million funding from Silver Lake, which gave the agency a controlling curiosity in WP Engine, the internet hosting supplier “sought to inflate its valuation and engineer a fast, profitable exit.” It allegedly did that, per the counterclaim, by describing itself because the “WordPress Know-how Firm” and permitting its companions to seek advice from it as “WordPress Engine,” violations of the WordPress trademark. Automattic claims merchandise WP Engine launched like “Core WordPress” and “Headless WordPress” additional obfuscated the corporate’s position, whereas WP Engine additionally didn’t commit a promised “5 % of its sources to help the WordPress mission.”

The counterclaim goes on to say that Automattic and Mullenweg tried to work out these points with WP Engine by providing a “truthful trademark license,” however the firm solely “pretended to interact in licensing discussions,” whereas really delaying any sort of settlement as a result of it will “impression its earnings.” Preserving earnings up was vital to WP Engine as a result of Silver Lake was allegedly attempting to promote WP Engine at a $2 billion valuation, and had even made “overtures to Automattic” about it.

A WP Engine spokesperson offered the next assertion to Engadget:

WP Engine’s use of the WordPress trademark to seek advice from the open-source software program is in line with longstanding trade follow and truthful use underneath settled trademark legislation, and we are going to defend in opposition to these baseless claims.

Auttomatic’s countersuit tells a unique story than the one WP Engine spun in its authentic lawsuit in opposition to the corporate, which accused Mullenweg of “abuse of energy, extortion and greed.” WP Engine’s authentic criticism claimed that Automattic requested the corporate for eight % of its month-to-month income as a royalty cost. Mullenweg’s makes an attempt to punish WP Engine have been seen as so aggressive on the time that over 100 Automattic workers voluntarily left the corporate in response. WP Engine gained a preliminary injunction in response to its lawsuit, however it looks like the story may be extra sophisticated than it initially appeared.

Replace, October 24, 3:35PM ET: Clarified Automattic’s relationship to open-source WordPress. The corporate will not be WordPress’ creator.